Can dried apricot fit a keto diet?

Usually does not fit

Usually, no: dried apricot does not fit a keto diet.

1 cup weighs 160 g; it provides 88.5 g calculated net carbs. The documented composition basis is 100 g dried sulfured uncooked apricots.

Check another amount

Values update from the same USDA record. They do not estimate a personal carb target or ketosis response.

Amount in grams

Listed source portion: 1 cup (160 g).

Calculated net carbs

88.5 g

Total carbohydrate

100.2 g

Dietary fiber

11.7 g

Editorial illustration of Apricot, dried.

Nutrition facts for Apricot, dried

Source-portion carb band: Higher net carbs per listed portion. The category is based only on calculated net carbs for the listed portion: 5 g or less, more than 5 g to 10 g, or more than 10 g. Your total intake, preparation, and clinical context can change how a food fits your own plan.

Nutrient	Per listed portion: 1 cup (160 g)	Per 100 g
Energy	386 kcal	241 kcal
Protein	5.4 g	3.4 g
Total fat	0.8 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Total carbohydrate	100.2 g	62.6 g
Dietary fiber	11.7 g	7.3 g
Calculated net carbs	88.5 g	55.3 g
Total sugars	85.4 g	53.4 g
Sodium	16 mg	10 mg
Potassium	1856 mg	1160 mg

The table keeps the USDA basis separate from the selected portion.

1. Food formApricot, dried
2. USDA per-100 g basis55.3 g calculated net carbs
3. Selected source portion88.5 g calculated net carbs
4. Calculation boundaryPortion value is calculated from the cited 100 g record and portion weight

Explore this food category

Compare this form and portion with other records in keto fruit. The category hub explains why forms, preparation, and portions should not be treated as interchangeable.

For meal-level context, use the keto-friendly fruits.

How the calculation works

Calculated net carbs = total carbohydrate − dietary fiber. For this USDA record, that is 62.6 g − 7.3 g = 55.3 g per 100 g. Net carbs is a planning convention used on this site; it is not a separate USDA nutrient field or a regulatory nutrition-label value. This calculation does not automatically subtract sugar alcohols.

For the underlying approach and its limitations, see how net carbs are explained and the net-carb calculator.

Food record and source

• USDA food description: Apricot, dried
• FoodData Central ID: FDC ID 2709197
• Dataset: Survey (FNDDS) FNDDS 2021-2023 (2024-10-31)
• Record publication date: 10/31/2024
• Selected portion: 1 cup (160 g)

The nutrition values are reported by the USDA per 100 g. The per-portion column above is calculated from that value and the USDA portion weight; no household measure was invented for this page.

1. USDA FoodData Central, Survey (FNDDS) FNDDS 2021-2023 (2024-10-31), FDC ID 2709197. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/food-search/?query=2709197, https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-datasets/FoodData_Central_survey_food_json_2024-10-31.zip

Compare related foods

• Apricot, raw — Compare another form of apricot.
• Fig, dried — Compare another food in the fruits whole food group.
• Prune, dried — Compare another food in the fruits whole food group.

Browse all Food Database entries or start with the keto food list for practical meal-planning context.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can dried apricot fit a keto diet?

Dried apricot usually does not fit a keto diet; 1 cup (160 g) contains 88.5 g calculated net carbs.

How many net carbs are in Apricot, dried?

The listed 1 cup (160 g) has 88.5 g calculated net carbs. Per 100 g, the record has 55.3 g calculated net carbs.

How are net carbs calculated for Apricot, dried?

247-Keto calculates net carbs as total carbohydrate minus dietary fiber, capped at zero. For this record, that is 62.6 g total carbohydrate minus 7.3 g fiber per 100 g. Sugar alcohols are not subtracted by this calculation.

Where do these Apricot, dried nutrition facts come from?

The values come from USDA FoodData Central's Survey (FNDDS) FNDDS 2021-2023 (2024-10-31) release, FDC ID 2709197. The page preserves the listed food description and portion weight so the comparison is traceable.

Article history

1. September 11, 2026Updated after final factual and editorial review
2. August 24, 2026First published